Skip to main content

Leader-Member Exchange

Leader-Member Exchange Theory resonates with me as the most holistic and realistic theory of leadership that I have studied thus far. This theory views leadership not as something that a leader does to their followers, but instead as something that exists between the leader and their followers. Leadership exists in the space between the leader and follower and in the relationships that form between the two (Northouse, 2016). The most effective leaders that I’ve had the honor of serving under have valued relationships above all else, using leader-member exchange as a cornerstone of their leadership philosophy. When I have a high quality relationship with my leader, I feel valued and am more likely to dedicate myself to the organization. Relationships matter greatly to me. Despite this, LMX is not without its flaws. When the focus on leadership is on relationships nepotism and implicit biases come into play and can cause great discord in organizations. Studies have shown that members who have a low quality leader-member exchange receive an unfair and severe disadvantage in their performance evaluations which can cause attrition and job dissatisfaction (Campbell & Swift, 2006). When LMX Theory is applied with the intention that all members participate in a high quality exchange with the leader many of these potential drawbacks can be addressed (Graen & Uhl-Bien, 1991).  

Itay Talgam (2009), in a TEDTalk discussed how great conductors lead their orchestra. Listening to Talgam describe how exactly each conductor communicated and provided direction to their orchestra reminded me about the relationship centered LMX Theory (Northouse, 2016). According to Talgam, the conductor brings out beautiful music from the chaos of noise in the orchestra. The conductor is responsible for creating an environment and process that makes it clear what the orchestra is to do. Of course each individual member has their own sheet music, but the conductor Conductors can be commanding, or they can leave members of the orchestra to their own devices. Most of all, the orchestra members are to be responsive to the conductor's communication. The communication between the leader and the members goes two ways. When a strong conductor makes an intentional effort to create a strong relationship and maintain excellent communication with their members, the result is beautiful music. When a leader makes this same intentional effort the results are a tight knit team, and positive results. 

https://www.bates-communications.com/bates-blog/overcoming-in-and-out-groups-in-teams


References

Campbell, C. R. & Swift, C.O. (2006). Attributional comparisons across biases and leader-member exchange status. Journal of Managerial Issues, (18)3, 393-408.

Graen, G. B. & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, (6)2, 217-247.  

Northouse, P. G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and practice (7th ed.). Sage Publishing.

Talgam, I. (2009). Lead like the great conductors. [Video]. Retrieved from: https://www.ted.com/talks/itay_talgam_lead_like_the_great_conductors


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How I found the Standards in my Life

I had standards by which I lived my life before I could explicitly identify them. I found that not every choice I made brought me closer to the person I wanted to be. I make decisions every day that bring me joy, sadness, fulfillment, and yearning for more. In an effort to understand how I make these decisions, and to be more intentional, I recently started a journey to reflect on my own core values. I have made many moves in my life and I wanted to better understand how I can make decisions that align with my core values. To facilitate this introspection I asked myself the questions below. In reflecting on these questions I found patterns. Patterns of behaviors and ways of being that helped me understand how I have lived in and out of alignment with my core values. Now that I am aware of them, and have them written out, these are my standards for decision making. These are the ways of being that help ensure I am living the life I want to live. Questions I asked myself What am I doing ...
Post a Comment
Read more

My Role(s) in a Team

Teamwork is a common thread throughout life. Growing up with parents and a sibling, working at my first job at McDonald's, and my marriage and current household all provide me with an opportunity to practice teamwork. Most, if not all, of the engagements in my life involve interacting and cooperating with others, so this exploration into how teams form and are led is an interesting practice of reviewing literature and reflecting on how I engage in my day-to-date life. As a part of a team, I tend to take leadership roles quite naturally. Whetten & Cameron (2011) describe several roles of embers within a team: task-facilitating, relationship-building, and blocking roles. I believe that I have played each role at some point. I feel most at home when I play a task-facilitation role, but I also make time and space for relationship-building. Teamwork is all about getting individual contributors to work together toward a common goal, so ensuring that the relationships among team membe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Constraints on Creative Problem Solving

Creative problem-solving requires a great deal of flexibility, and acceptance of risk which can be difficult for businesses who are generally risk averse to embrace. Many constraints also exist in our individual thinking which limit our capacity to think and problem-solve creatively (Whetten & Cameron, 2016). In my own experience in the nonprofit and social service industries I have seen these constraints hold back otherwise successful individuals.  “Well, this is how we’ve always done it” I’m sure you’ve heard this common refrain from supervisors and teammates in the past. Generally, we hear this when someone questions an existing policy, procedure, or process. The inquiry is not personal, but this knee-jerk response is a clear indicator that the individuals are experiencing some conceptual blocks to creative problem solving. Complacency is a major impediment to thinking differently, in fact, complacency may mean that the people in question are not thinking at all. When we avo...
Post a Comment
Read more