Skip to main content

Radical Self-Accountability

Radical Self-Accountability 

A close confidant and friend of mine Jade Jamie (personal communication, 2 October 2020) is a health and wellness coach. We recently discussed a concept she calls radical self-accountability. To Jade, everything is her own responsibility, even events that many would see as out of their control. If Jade cannot control the outcome of an event, she instead takes responsibility for the reaction she has to that event. Before radical self-accountability Jade found frustration and anxiety in life. She felt that others had control over her life and were responsible for her suffering. With this new outlook of self-accountability in life, Jade now sees that suffering, success, and everything in between is of her own doing. Reflecting on this I see that this is something that also guides my own actions and outlook on life. I feel responsible for what I do and how I react to the events of my life. I can’t change the world, but I can change how I react to it.      

Locus of Control 

The question of accountability and control has been conceptualized in a succinct way by the locus of control. Using this theory, control can be viewed as being deriving internally or externally. Those with an internal locus of control believe that they exercise control over the events of their life, whereas those with an external locus of control believe that outside forces, such as chance or others with more power, “determine life events,” (Northouse, 2016, p. 119). For many years, locus of control was seen as a stable inborn trait: one either has an internal or external locus of control. Recent studies suggest that on a day-to-day basis an individual’s locus of control can shift internally and externally and even that over time “Individuals who experience successful control attempts” may develop a more internal locus of control (Ryon & Gleason, 2014, p. 122)    

Before researching this theory more deeply, I initially thought that I had an internal locus of control in alignment with radical self-accountability. The thought that others might have more power over my life than me is a scary, anxiety-inducing idea. Further reading on the topic confirms my place as a person with an internal locus of control when analyzing how I prefer to experience supervision at work. Employees with an internal locus of control “are more satisfied with participatory management style than are externals,” (Mitchell, Smyser, & Weed, 1975, p. 629). I find this to be true for me. A participatory leadership style seeks input from followers and allows them to be a part of the decision-making process (Northouse, 2016). When I am left out from decision making, I find myself feeling frustrated because control is taken from me.

Resilience 

While I am not someone who likes to pass judgment on how others live their lives, the literature suggests that individuals who live their lives with an internal locus of control are much better off than those who give them power away externally. Those with an external locus of control are more likely to experience anxiety and depression in response to stress. This may be because they feel that they do not have any power to change their situation to remove their stress. They rely on “powerful others, fate, or chance” to change their lives (Ryon & Gleason, 2014, p. 121). I may not be the master of the universe, but I am the leader of my life.  


Image from: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/moments-matter/201708/locus-control


References

Mitchell, T., Smyser, CR., & Weed, SE. (1975). Locus of control: Supervision and work satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 18(3), 623-631. http://www.jstor.org/stable/255692

Northouse, P. G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and practice (7th ed.). Sage Publishing.

Ryon, H. S., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2014). The role of locus of control in daily life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(1), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213507087

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Role(s) in a Team

Teamwork is a common thread throughout life. Growing up with parents and a sibling, working at my first job at McDonald's, and my marriage and current household all provide me with an opportunity to practice teamwork. Most, if not all, of the engagements in my life involve interacting and cooperating with others, so this exploration into how teams form and are led is an interesting practice of reviewing literature and reflecting on how I engage in my day-to-date life. As a part of a team, I tend to take leadership roles quite naturally. Whetten & Cameron (2011) describe several roles of embers within a team: task-facilitating, relationship-building, and blocking roles. I believe that I have played each role at some point. I feel most at home when I play a task-facilitation role, but I also make time and space for relationship-building. Teamwork is all about getting individual contributors to work together toward a common goal, so ensuring that the relationships among team membe...
Post a Comment
Read more

How I found the Standards in my Life

I had standards by which I lived my life before I could explicitly identify them. I found that not every choice I made brought me closer to the person I wanted to be. I make decisions every day that bring me joy, sadness, fulfillment, and yearning for more. In an effort to understand how I make these decisions, and to be more intentional, I recently started a journey to reflect on my own core values. I have made many moves in my life and I wanted to better understand how I can make decisions that align with my core values. To facilitate this introspection I asked myself the questions below. In reflecting on these questions I found patterns. Patterns of behaviors and ways of being that helped me understand how I have lived in and out of alignment with my core values. Now that I am aware of them, and have them written out, these are my standards for decision making. These are the ways of being that help ensure I am living the life I want to live. Questions I asked myself What am I doing ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Leaders and Followers and How They Work Together

Obolensky (2016) provides a 16 question assessment to help readers assess the leadership strategy that they mostly gravitate towards. Below I describe four leadership strategies as outlined by Obolensky (2016).  Strategy I - Tell You've probably used this strategy before. Telling someone what to do! This strategy is pretty straight forward, however, it requires the leader to know what to do. This prescriptive approach is a direct strategy that focuses attention on the goal/outcome rather than on the people. The tell strategy I only selected once in this assessment.  Strategy II - Sell Sell strikes a balance between focusing leadership efforts on the goal and on the people executing the goal. Much like a salesperson, the sell strategy requires the leader to fully understand the situation and for them to describe the benefits and risks associated with the actions to be undertaken. A good sales person can make their client (or in this case employee) feel good about their purchase...
Post a Comment
Read more