Skip to main content

A500.2.3.GA Going Around the Circle

Mayor Van Johnson for the City of Savannah gave a press briefing on July 14th 2020 at 11:00 AM as an update to the state of the Coronavirus pandemic in the City (WJCL, 2020). In this press briefing the Mayor made an appeal to the denizens of the city to carefully follow the recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control and to brace for additional recommendations and Emergency Orders by the City if necessary. This writing will be an exercise of going around the 8+ elements of reasoning on the question at issue of the city ordinance requiring face masks in public spaces (Nosich, 2012, p. 49).

On June 30th of 2020 the City of Savannah passed an emergency order requiring face coverings in public places within the city limits. The purpose of this order, as stated by the Mayor, was “to slow the spread of the novel coronavirus disease,” within our city (WJCL, 2020). The order was drafted with information from federal, state, and local experts on the disease in mind. This information from the Centers for Disease Control and World Health Organization included data about cases of COVID-19 increasing within the city limits and that wearing facemasks can help slow the spread of the disease. It is the Mayor’s interpretation of the data that it “necessitates a substantial paradigm shift and corresponding drastic action to keep Savannah safe,” (WJCL, 2020). It also rests on the city’s interpretation of the current situation as an emergency and that the Georgia Statutes authorize these actions by the Mayor. The concepts of “safety” and “emergency” are used in this reasoning and include assumptions that it is the duty of governments to take measures to keep its residents free from the harms of disease, and that the current environment constitutes an emergency.

All of the above reasoning was taken from the point of view of a city government and within the context of the State of Georgia’s ordinance that has explicitly forbidden these kinds of restrictions. In the current climate where these kinds of decisions are highly politicized some implications of these actions may include citizen noncompliance, conflict between State and City law, and the imposition of behavior policing. All of this also exists within the context of a society coming to terms with the disproportionalities that exist within institutions of public safety, and a community that is majority Black. Police officers are authorized to enforce these orders and will issue citations of $500 for noncompliance.

The Mayor continuously throughout his speaking arrangements stresses that these decisions are made by taking into account “facts not feelings” and that they are acting in the public good and in response to science (WJCL, 2020). Taking a closer look at the reasoning behind the City’s emergency order helps to better “understand, in a fairly deep way, just what [the Mayor] is saying and how [he] is reasoning through an issue,” (Nosich, 2012, p. 67).

References

Nosich, G. M. (2012). Learning to think things through: A guide to critical thinking across the curriculum (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

WJCL. (2020, July 14). Savannah major july 14 press conference [video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qijJCV3UYhI


A500.2.3.GA  Going Around the Circle
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How I found the Standards in my Life

I had standards by which I lived my life before I could explicitly identify them. I found that not every choice I made brought me closer to the person I wanted to be. I make decisions every day that bring me joy, sadness, fulfillment, and yearning for more. In an effort to understand how I make these decisions, and to be more intentional, I recently started a journey to reflect on my own core values. I have made many moves in my life and I wanted to better understand how I can make decisions that align with my core values. To facilitate this introspection I asked myself the questions below. In reflecting on these questions I found patterns. Patterns of behaviors and ways of being that helped me understand how I have lived in and out of alignment with my core values. Now that I am aware of them, and have them written out, these are my standards for decision making. These are the ways of being that help ensure I am living the life I want to live. Questions I asked myself What am I doing ...
Post a Comment
Read more

My Role(s) in a Team

Teamwork is a common thread throughout life. Growing up with parents and a sibling, working at my first job at McDonald's, and my marriage and current household all provide me with an opportunity to practice teamwork. Most, if not all, of the engagements in my life involve interacting and cooperating with others, so this exploration into how teams form and are led is an interesting practice of reviewing literature and reflecting on how I engage in my day-to-date life. As a part of a team, I tend to take leadership roles quite naturally. Whetten & Cameron (2011) describe several roles of embers within a team: task-facilitating, relationship-building, and blocking roles. I believe that I have played each role at some point. I feel most at home when I play a task-facilitation role, but I also make time and space for relationship-building. Teamwork is all about getting individual contributors to work together toward a common goal, so ensuring that the relationships among team membe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Constraints on Creative Problem Solving

Creative problem-solving requires a great deal of flexibility, and acceptance of risk which can be difficult for businesses who are generally risk averse to embrace. Many constraints also exist in our individual thinking which limit our capacity to think and problem-solve creatively (Whetten & Cameron, 2016). In my own experience in the nonprofit and social service industries I have seen these constraints hold back otherwise successful individuals.  “Well, this is how we’ve always done it” I’m sure you’ve heard this common refrain from supervisors and teammates in the past. Generally, we hear this when someone questions an existing policy, procedure, or process. The inquiry is not personal, but this knee-jerk response is a clear indicator that the individuals are experiencing some conceptual blocks to creative problem solving. Complacency is a major impediment to thinking differently, in fact, complacency may mean that the people in question are not thinking at all. When we avo...
Post a Comment
Read more