Skip to main content

Reflect on Critical Thinking Assessment

My favorite classes in my undergraduate studies related to rhetoric and epistemology. Through my minor in Editing, Writing, and Media I took my first look at critical thinking as we analyzed the origins of knowledge. My personal definition of critical thinking is reflecting on how and why we come to the conclusions that we do in order to ensure we are making the best decision with the information at our disposal. This definition aligns quite closely with Richard Paul’s definition as described in Learning to Think Things Through; “Critical thinking is thinking about your thinking, while you’re thinking, in order to make your thinking better.” This definition resonates with me as it homes in on the metacognitive nature of critical thinking and highlights the relationships between epistemology and critical thinking (Nosich, 2012). This kind of reflection is central to thinking critically.

Having arrived at some basic understanding of how critical thinking operates in my studies, my results are on par with how I interpret my own understanding of critical thinking concepts. The Online Critical Thinking Basic Concepts Test reflects that I have a strong understanding of some basic critical thinking insight, answering 92% of the questions in this category correctly. That is to say that I understand, broadly, what critical thinking is and isn’t. The section about recognizing important distinctions in critical thinking shows that I lack understanding of more nuanced elements of critical thinking, having only answered 53% of those questions correctly. This is an opportunity for me to grow and learn, as I am not familiar with the terminology related to different parts, abilities, traits, obstacles, and intellectual standards as they relate to critical thought. The discussion around fallacies earlier this week reflect how important recognizing obstacles to, and the parts of critical thinking can be. In my example about purchasing an HP printer based solely off my friend’s experiences, I see how my own personal experience can be an obstacle to critical thinking. It also shows just how manipulative politics and advertising can be; they prey on our tendency to rely on shortcuts, feelings, and non-reasoning to earn our vote, or our money. By reflecting on the media that we consume, and how we make decisions we can become better critical thinkers and thus exercise more control over our lives. Having these real-life examples of how I personally fail to exercise critical thinking can help me to anchor the topics to something tangible and find alternative ways to move through the experiences of life.

I see that the Foundation for Critical Thinking is a wealth of knowledge about critical thinking and reinforces the assigned readings for the course. This Foundation was in fact founded by major contributors to the development of the discipline. In particular, the Elements and Standards Learning Tool at criticalthinking.org is a useful online model to help me conceptualize the elements of critical thinking as I read ahead to the next set of assigned readings. I hope to gain a strong understanding of the more nuanced elements of critical thinking throughout the Master of Science in Leadership Program by using these resources as well as additional scholarly articles that I can find through the Hunt Library.


References

Nosich, G. M. (2012). Learning to think things through: A guide to critical thinking across the curriculum (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

 A500.1.4.GA Reflect on Critical Thinking Assessment


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How I found the Standards in my Life

I had standards by which I lived my life before I could explicitly identify them. I found that not every choice I made brought me closer to the person I wanted to be. I make decisions every day that bring me joy, sadness, fulfillment, and yearning for more. In an effort to understand how I make these decisions, and to be more intentional, I recently started a journey to reflect on my own core values. I have made many moves in my life and I wanted to better understand how I can make decisions that align with my core values. To facilitate this introspection I asked myself the questions below. In reflecting on these questions I found patterns. Patterns of behaviors and ways of being that helped me understand how I have lived in and out of alignment with my core values. Now that I am aware of them, and have them written out, these are my standards for decision making. These are the ways of being that help ensure I am living the life I want to live. Questions I asked myself What am I doing ...

My Role(s) in a Team

Teamwork is a common thread throughout life. Growing up with parents and a sibling, working at my first job at McDonald's, and my marriage and current household all provide me with an opportunity to practice teamwork. Most, if not all, of the engagements in my life involve interacting and cooperating with others, so this exploration into how teams form and are led is an interesting practice of reviewing literature and reflecting on how I engage in my day-to-date life. As a part of a team, I tend to take leadership roles quite naturally. Whetten & Cameron (2011) describe several roles of embers within a team: task-facilitating, relationship-building, and blocking roles. I believe that I have played each role at some point. I feel most at home when I play a task-facilitation role, but I also make time and space for relationship-building. Teamwork is all about getting individual contributors to work together toward a common goal, so ensuring that the relationships among team membe...

Constraints on Creative Problem Solving

Creative problem-solving requires a great deal of flexibility, and acceptance of risk which can be difficult for businesses who are generally risk averse to embrace. Many constraints also exist in our individual thinking which limit our capacity to think and problem-solve creatively (Whetten & Cameron, 2016). In my own experience in the nonprofit and social service industries I have seen these constraints hold back otherwise successful individuals.  “Well, this is how we’ve always done it” I’m sure you’ve heard this common refrain from supervisors and teammates in the past. Generally, we hear this when someone questions an existing policy, procedure, or process. The inquiry is not personal, but this knee-jerk response is a clear indicator that the individuals are experiencing some conceptual blocks to creative problem solving. Complacency is a major impediment to thinking differently, in fact, complacency may mean that the people in question are not thinking at all. When we avo...